Wednesday, November 24, 2010

Cinegasm Episode 015

Episode 015 - Click to listen in your browser
or right-click and "Save Target As" to download

Host: Kevin Brotman
Co-Hosts:
Brian J Blottie, Stephen LaRose, Melissa Hanson


  • Topic of the Week: The advent of solely streaming content (Hulu+, Netflix's new shindig, Redbox, etc.)

Review: "The Next Three Days" (2010)



IMDB link

by Melissa Hanson

Life is good with husband and wife John and Lara (Russell Crowe and Elizabeth Banks) until she is convicted of murder and put away for life. Their son is three years old when she goes to prison, and through the next three years, (see a pattern?) life is tough as John tries to scrap by filing appeals and focusing on his son. Things take a turn for the worse when the last appeal is denied and Lara attempts suicide. I think you can guess how it goes from here.

I am a big Russell Crowe fan, but I had a hard time buying him as a school teacher not knowing how to put bullets in a gun. I really didn't feel he was right for this role. He's a great actor and he can play so many characters so well. He was amazing in A Beautiful Mind as well as The Insider. His character didn't developed subtly, he seemed to all of a sudden be a badass. It could be that there were crucial scenes cut from the movie that filled in the gaps, but as the final theatrical cut, I didn't see it. I think he was trying to keep it low-key, but it just didn't work for me. Unfortunately, neither did Elizabeth Banks. I also really like her work, but this felt very cardboard to me. I could tell that I should feel more sadness for her character, but I didn't.

I really did enjoy the last third of the movie and how it played out, but, it was very difficult for me to understand how John set it all up just by having one enlightening conversation with ex-con, Liam Neeson. We see John planning and going to the library, etc, but no other help from there. Nothing on how his emotions are breaking down. Just LOTS of dumb luck in situations.

The saving grace is that it keeps a good pace and has some very tense moments. It's not a waste of time, but I think it's doom is acting as though we don't know how it's going to turn out.

On a side note, can I just say that Kevin Corrigan is in EVERYTHING.  He's one of the most entertaining and employable actors in Hollywood. From the first shadow of his hair, I knew it was him and I was happy.

Friday, November 19, 2010

Review: "Harry Potter and the Deathly Hollows Part One" (2010)



IMDB Link

by Brian J Blottie
For nine years, Harry Potter has been one of the most successful film franchises in the history of film. As the years passed, and it's core audience has grown up, the movies themselves grew up with them, taking on a darker and more foreboding tone with each release. Finally, the end is near, as the first half of the two part conclusion, "The Deathly Hollows", has been released, and it continues the progress from light-hearted to dread-filled series successfully.

This is, by far, one of the darkest, most despairing fantasies to be put to film. The sense of wonder is gone, replaced by an almost Nazi-like narrative, in which Voldemort (Ralph Fiennes) and his cohorts go to great lengths to hunt down Harry Potter (Daniel Radcliffe) and his friends, taking over the Ministry of Magic and Hogwarts through fear and murder. A great deal of the film sees Harry exhausted, uncertain of what to do next, while Hermione (Emma Watson) and Ron (Rupert Grint) try their best to support him, though their own doubts and fears slowly tear the trio apart. This is not a children's film, as the dark story combined with the frightening characters and graphic depictions of violence and death are closer to Pan's Labyrinth than the initial offerings. With that said, this is a much stronger movie than any of the Harry Potter series before it, as you truly do feel the sense of hopelessness that pervades the film.

The supporting cast is fantastic, from Ralph Fiennes horrific Voldemort to Bill Nighy's Head of the Ministry, with Rhys Ifans' portrayal of Xenophilius Lovegood particularly great. But the real star of the show is Rupert Grint, who brings more depth and emotion to Ron Weasley than ever before. While Daniel Radcliffe will forever be known as Harry, and Emma Watson has grown into a beautiful but passable actress, Grint is the actor who has the brightest future ahead of him. When he is gone from the screen, you realize just how powerful his acting is, as things seem to fall flat when Watson and Radcliffe are left to carry scenes on their own. This is no knock to either star, as they still carry it well, but instead is praise for Grint.

From scene to scene, there is very little light, further enhancing the gloomy narrative with a realistic but almost overwhelming apprehension. This is not the world that left you breathless with awe in the first few films; it's a lonely world, filled with whites and grays, as the trio of heroes are left for the first time to fend for themselves. The special effects are incredible as usual, but do not take anything away from the story told. Rather, they enhance each scene, guiding you from place to place in the narrative.

Splitting the film into two might actually be a great idea in this case, as the end of the film actually feels like an ending and a beginning. What felt originally like a money grab by the studio instead feels like a completely natural end point of the film, and leaves you wanting for more. Eight months is a long time between movies, but in this case it's actually worth the wait; it'll take that long for all of the symbolism and complexities presented to really settle in on subsequent viewings.

The darkest film in the series, the first part of a story that finally concludes the tale of Harry Potter, "The Deathly Hollows" is finally here. Some will see it as too depressing, as a film meant to scare rather than impress. Others will see it as the finest film in the series, a slow build to what is sure to be a spectacular conclusion. Whichever side of the fence you are on, this film will stick with you for longer than it's two-and-a-half hour running time, which only the best films in cinema do.


Thursday, November 18, 2010

Review: "Morning Glory" (2010)



IMDB Link

by Casey O'Connor
For decades, "chick flick" has been a part of the American vernacular. Those feel-good movies that make us believe anything is possible. In Morning Glory, Rachel McAdams plays Becky Fuller - a spunky morning show producer. It takes less than five minutes to establish Fuller as an ambitious, if personally scatterbrained, workaholic. It's clear the script follows the same vein as, well, just about every female empowerment movie of the last twenty years. McAdams fires off stuttering, self-deprecating monologues with a speed that can only be considered exhausting.

The premise is fairly straight forward; instead of getting the expected promotion, Becky Fuller is laid off due to budget cuts. So she takes the only job she can get, as executive producer of a failing morning show. Thankfully, things pick up at this point, with the introduction of the supporting cast.

Harrison Ford, as an aging newsman essentially blackmailed into taking a co-anchor spot, is inconsistent at best. The one true high point of the film is Diane Keaton. Her determination to keep the show alive provides most of the film's positive moments.

At the core, the problem with Morning Glory is not it's predictability; many well-made films follow well trod paths. The real problem is that the film can't decide what it wants to be. With quick shifts between romantic comedy, to self-discovery story, and every stereotype in between, the script simply fails to find a nice.

If you're looking for a light-hearted comedy, grab your Working Girl DVD and save the ticket price.


Wednesday, November 17, 2010

Cinegasm Episode 014

Episode 014 - Click to listen in your browser
or right-click and "Save Target As" to download

Host: Brian J Blottie
Co-Hosts: Stephen LaRose, Graham Malin, Chris Perkins, Melissa Hanson


  • Topic of the Week: Favorite movie snack
    • Melissa - popcorn & Milkduds
    • Stephen - Peanut M&Ms
    • Graham - Sour Patch Kids
    • Chris - Movie Pretzels, Bon Bons
    • Brian - chocolate covered raisins & popcorn

Review: "Today's Special" (2010)



IMDB link 

by Melissa Hanson

It's a familiar story of a father and son, but director David Kaplan manages to keep the audience engaged and entertained. He directs Aasif Mandvi (The Daily Show on Comedy Central) and a first rate cast in this lovely indie comedy.

Samir (Aasif Mandvi), a sous chef in a Manhattan restaurant is passed over for a promotion by the head chef, Steve (played by the charming Dean Winters) because he doesn't see the passion in Samir's cooking. Samir impulsively quits his job and tells one of his co-workers, Carrie (Jess Weixler), that he's moving to Paris to apprentice. This, of course, backfires as Samir ends up taking over the family business, an Indian restaurant in Jackson Heights, (Queens) New York.

He enlists the help of a taxi driver, Akbar (Naseeruddin Shah), whom he struck up a conversation with days earlier. Yeah, it's contrived, but in a most indelible way. The new chef is completely opposite of him and soon Samir is embracing his roots, falling in love and rediscovering his passion for food. Aasif' gives an amazing dimension to the role with subtle gestures and pitch perfect timing while Naseeruddin's performance makes even the most non-cooking people (myself included) understand the passion of chefs.

The film is refreshingly authentic and close to home. Instead of mocking or exploiting the various aspects of Indian culture, it celebrates it and shows the audience a family. You will leave this movie happy and hungry.

Opens in limited release November 19th, 2010.

Review: "I Love You Phillip Morris" (2010)



IMDB link

by Melissa Hanson

My sister: "So how was the movie?"
Me: "Jim Carrey was hilarious."
My sister: "Haven't heard THAT in a while."

I gotta say, it's really awesome to see a funny Jim Carrey movie. He plays Stephen Russell, who's true story was adapted by Glenn Ficarra and John Requa, the first-time directors of the film. Stephen is a cop in Georgia, married to a lovely wife (Leslie Mann) with a daughter when he has an experience that causes him to start living his life to the fullest. He comes out as a gay man and develops extravagant tastes to the point where he starts conning people to pay for it all.

There are so many "bait and switch" moments in the movie that you're never quite sure when you'll be hit again. Stephen is flawed, but completely likeable. Even when he does terrible things, we forgive him, as we see his intentions weren't entirely selfish. Stephen showers affection on his new boyfriend, Phillip (Ewan MacGregor) and goes to great lengths to sustain their lifestyle. At one point he pays to have a guy beat up, just so Phillip can sleep through the night. Now that's love.

At the core, it's a love story. It's a hilarious love story that happens to be between two gay men. Jim Carrey is back to being a charming and ridiculous character. This was a perfect movie for him. He also does some physical comedy which is completely valid for the story and almost nostalgic.

It reminds me of Catch Me If You Can, but sillier. It's a good movie. I quite enjoyed it.

Opens in limited release in New York and Los Angeles on December 3, 2010.

Wednesday, November 10, 2010

Cinegasm Episode 013

Episode 013 - Click to listen in your browser
or right-click and "Save Target As" to download

Host: Brian J Blottie
Co-Hosts: Stephen LaRose, Melissa Hanson



  • Topic of the Week: Are star or number ratings truly representative of a movie's quality, or do they "dumb down" the process of criticism to the point that most people don't read the actual criticisms, instead just glance at the numbers. Tell us what you think!

Tuesday, November 9, 2010

Review: "127 Hours" (2010)


IMDB link

by Melissa Hanson

Here's the facts: Aron Ralston was climbing in the canyons of Utah when he fell and got his hand wedged by a rock, and cut it off to escape. Knowing this going into the movie already creates a level of anticipation to keep you on the edge of your seat. So how do you keep that level without losing the audience? Danny Boyle's style and James Franco's Aron, manage to show us the progression making us realize how it could happen to anyone.

Aron is up for an adventure through Blue John Canyon in Utah one Saturday and he packs up his gear and heads out. During his hike, he meets two young women who are semi-lost and shows them a remote area. They think he's a guide, but as he puts it, "I'm an engineer, but this is what I really want to do." After he leads them in the right direction, he continues to the canyon.  He finds the canyon and as he's repelling himself down, a boulder shifts and pins his right hand. Now for the next 127 hours.

Soon after he gets pinned, you start feeling claustrophobic as the camera moves and gives you his unique perspective. With every angle change, you feel like you are maneuvering yourself out of the space. It's really uncomfortable, and almost interactive. The camera zooms out wide and the shot of the canyon amplifies his feeling of helplessness. As time progresses, you begin to realize that small tasks like taking off a watch are now feats to overcome.

This is not really a movie that you "enjoy," it's more of an emotional experience. Hearing the story you think to yourself that you could never to what Aron Ralston did. However, with each small event happening on screen, you begin to imagine how it could. The level of realism really pulls you in and can be difficult to watch at times.  Like any true story, the point isn't what happened necessarily, but more of how it happened. I liked that it didn't go for the cheesy "inspirational" angle, just more about how, when faced with adversity, you do what you got to do. Big lesson from this movie: tell people where you are going JUST IN CASE.


Saturday, November 6, 2010

Review: "Tangled" (2010)

IMDB Link

by Brian J Blottie

Once upon a time, Disney Animation Studios were considered the masters of animated film. What they did with cell animation was breathtaking to behold, and the stories they wrapped around that animation were as compelling and bold as any motion picture being released at that time. Slowly, cell animation gave way to CGI, and Pixar rose as the masters of this new style. Disney Animation Studios tried to keep up, releasing "Meet the Robinsons" (2007) and "Bolt" (2008), which were made when Disney and Pixar were "on the outs". Sadly, these films didn't live up to the quality that came out of Pixar, nor did they live up to the quality expected of Disney Animation Studios. Fast forward two years, and Disney once again dips their toes in the CGI animation pool, this time with much more success.
This is, as all the best Disney films are, a retelling of a fairy tale; Rapunzel. In this particular retelling, Rapunzel is the kidnapped daughter of the King and Queen of the kingdom, and is trapped in a secluded tower by the woman she thinks of as her mother, an old witch named Mother Gothel. Rapunzel has magic hair, which heals and rejuvenates anyone who touches it when she sings. Mother Gothel uses this to keep herself forever young, and convinces Rapunzel that to leave the tower is certain death, as the world is full of "thieves and murderers". This, of course, does nothing to dissuade Rapunzel, who wishes on her eighteenth birthday to see the "lights in the sky" that fill the night on each of her birthdays. With the introduction of the thief, Flynn Ryder, who is running from the kingdom, his partners in crime, and a very cunning horse, Rapunzel sees a way to finally escape her tower. Needless to say, Flynn Ryder and Rapunzel's adventures begin from there.
The movie takes some time to build up steam, as the first few songs (yes, songs make their triumphant return, and to great effect) and minutes of the film seem to stammer along, but once Flynn Ryder is introduced, the action picks up, as does the storytelling. As usual, Disney changes large portions of the fairy tale, but in this instance, it's actually for the better, as the story is more about finding one's self and allowing yourself to rely on others than it is about a girl with really long hair. The music is for the most part great, drives forward the narrative, and in one particular instance (the scene on the lake) will actually bring tears to your eyes. I'd also be remiss if I didn't mention the animals in the film, which like the best Disney side characters, are hilarious and don't at all detract from the story.
Mandy Moore voices Rapunzel, and does a wonderful job of it. You can hear the sense of wonder in her voice as she discovers the world around her, and also the dread of breaking her mother's heart at having left the tower. Emotional resonance through vocal inflection is incredibly important in these types of pictures, and of all the actors, Mandy seems to understand that the best. This is to take nothing away from Zachary Levi, who is more known for his role in television's "Chuck" as the geek turned spy, than the talented voice actor he is, as he plays Flynn Ryder with gusto, doubling as both the aforementioned character and the narrator of the movie. He's funny, dynamic, and the perfect vocal foil to Mandy Moore's youthful exuberance. The only failing in the voice acting actually falls on Donna Murphy, who plays Rapunzel's captor, Mother Gothel. Rather than trying to create a character of her own, she seems to instead emulate Pat Carroll's "Ursula" from "The Little Mermaid", and while she does so with zeal, it makes the character seem less original and more a carbon copy than anything else. Otherwise, this is a fantastic voice cast, down to the assorted extras (notably Brad Garrett, Jeffrey Tambor, and Ron Perlman), and they all breathe life into the fantasy land they inhabit.
One of the things that made Disney so good at what they did was the breathtaking way in which they presented the worlds they created. Beast's castle in "Beauty and the Beast", the gorgeous ocean in "The Little Mermaid", and most spectacularly the desert world of "Aladdin" all were amazing achievements, and left you in awe at what was accomplished. For the first time in years, Disney does this again with "Tangled". There isn't a single scene that isn't filled with the little touches that have made Disney's animation the most respected in the world, and you can feel the love the creators had for their creation. The water effects in particular are stunning, with a sequence featuring a dam breaking down causing goosebumps it is so well done. This is a triumph, and for once Disney Animation Studios has matched their "little brother" in Pixar in CG-animation. Even if the movie itself was not great, it would be worth it to see just what Disney has done here.
The most important aspect of a Disney film is one that many people forget; will parents be as enthralled with the world, the story, and the characters as their children are. One of the reasons Disney has been so successful in the past is that parents of all ages grew up with these pictures, and passed them onto their kids. With each release, Disney could count on parents who grew up with "Cinderella" to bring their children to see "The Little Mermaid". Parents who loved "Bambi" as children brought their own to see "The Lion King". Seeing a Disney film with your child was almost as important a step in life as teaching them to read, or getting them ready for their first day of school. It was a moment the parent could share with their child that they themselves experienced with their own parents, and it was special. Up until now, Pixar has become the Disney subsidiary that creates those moments, but they are not as profound as seeing a fairy tale you once loved brought to life by animators who cared about every hair on every head. For the first time since "The Lion King", Disney Animation has created a film that truly feels like something special. You'll laugh, you'll tear up, and you'll believe in the magic of Disney.
Pixar finally has a challenger to the throne, and while this isn't quite up to the level of "WALL-E" or "Up", which I consider to be Pixar's masterworks, it can certainly sit on the same shelf as the Disney classics that we grew up loving, and not at all seem out of place.



Friday, November 5, 2010

Review: "Teeth" (2007)

by Stephen LaRose

Three minutes into Mitchell Lichtenstein’s Teeth, I knew I would be in for a good time. In case you aren’t aware of the premise, it’s about a girl, Dawn (played by Jess Weixler), who has “vagina dentate” or teeth in her pussy. I know, right? Jess lives a life of purity and abstinence, until one high school hunk decides to rape her in a cave, only to have his dick bitten off by her demon honey pot. This is when she discovers her “power”, so to speak.
The first half of this film seems to take itself a bit too seriously. I feel that Lichtenstein fails to deliver a gripping character piece about Jess; it seems like he wanted this character to follow a tremendous arc of self discovery. Which she does to an extent, but not to the extent which I believe Lichtenstein desired. The plot drags along until the half way point. The change of pace comes when Jess throws her purity ring into a lake. This is where the fun begins. Everything becomes much looser in tone. Lichtenstein gets his own joke, and turns Weixler into some kind of anti-male super hero.
Dawn follows a path similar to that of Bruce Banner and his Hulk powers. She discovers her power, and can’t help but chomp on wieners. Then, after learning about her problem, she is able to control it. By the film’s end, we see her desire to want to use her “power” for good. Although, given the odd and twisted circumstances, Lichtenstein gives us something we’ve never seen before, and will probably never see again. Now, don’t get me wrong, Teeth is a pretty awful film, but it has its moments.
The film hints at a subplot between Dawn’s step brother (John Hensley) and her step father (Lenny von Dohlen). This never plays out, and lacks the complexity it needs to mean anything. I guess they left this in to pump up the runtime, a whopping 93 minutes. Also, the score seems to be written more for a b-roll of footage of the Sahara desert; although, in the latter half of the movie, it adds to its cheese factor. All problems aside, with the right mindset, anyone can have a few laughs with Teeth.

Wednesday, November 3, 2010

Cinegasm Episode 012

Episode 012 - Click to listen in your browser (sorry, it's a bit robotic at times!)
or right-click and "Save Target As" to download

Host: Brian J Blottie
Co-Hosts: Stephen LaRose, Graham Malin

Special Guest: Ben Brown from One Man's Film Tangent